Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 737
Filtrar
1.
Rev. neurol. (Ed. impr.) ; 77(7)1 - 15 de Octubre 2023. ilus, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-226078

RESUMO

Introducción La enfermedad de Parkinson (EP) y la esquizofrenia pueden coexistir. Los antipsicóticos bloquean los receptores D2 estriados, lo que inevitablemente agrava las manifestaciones de la EP. Caso clínico Presentamos el caso de un paciente con enfermedad de Parkinson idiopática y esquizofrenia, con pobre tolerancia a dosis mínimas de levodopa, que presentó una gran mejoría tras la estimulación cerebral profunda subtalámica bilateral (ECP-NST). La ECP-NST se consideró aquí, debido a la gravedad de este caso particular, como la única posibilidad de lograr una mejoría motora. Conclusiones El diagnóstico de EP idiopática se confirmó pese al tratamiento antidopaminérgico. La ECP-NST puede considerarse como una opción de tratamiento para las manifestaciones de la EP invalidantes, siempre y cuando la selección del paciente sea cuidadosa. (AU)


Introduction. Parkinson’s disease (PD) and schizophrenia can coexist. Antipsychotics block striatal D2 receptors, which inevitably aggravates the manifestations of PD.Case report. We report the case of a male patient with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease and schizophrenia, with poor tolerance to minimal doses of levodopa, who underwent a dramatic improvement after bilateral subthalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS-STN). DBS-STN was taken into consideration here, due to the severity of this particular case, as the only possible way to achieve motor improvement.Conclusions. The diagnosis of idiopathic PD was confirmed despite antidopaminergic treatment. DBS-STN can be considered a treatment option for disabling manifestations of PD, provided that a careful selection of patients is carried out. (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Doença de Parkinson/complicações , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Parkinson/patologia , Doença de Parkinson/reabilitação , Doença de Parkinson/terapia , Esquizofrenia , Espanha , Estimulação Encefálica Profunda , Dopaminérgicos/administração & dosagem , Dopaminérgicos/efeitos adversos , Doenças Neurodegenerativas
2.
Eur Neurol ; 86(6): 377-386, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37673041

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Sleep disorders are common in Parkinson's disease (PD) and significantly impact quality of life. Herein, we surveyed the incidence and severity of sleep disorders in Chinese PD patients and observed their relationship with dopaminergic drugs. METHODS: We collected the demographic and disease information of 232 PD patients. The incidence and severity of sleep disorders were surveyed with the Parkinson's disease sleep scale (PDSS) Chinese version. Data on dopaminergic drug intake were collected and converted to levodopa equivalent doses (LED). RESULTS: The average total score of PDSS in 232 patients was 119.3 ± 19.7. There was a significant difference in PDSS scores between groups classified by the Hoehn-Yahr (H&Y) stage, but not between the groups classified by the type of dopaminergic drugs. Stepwise regression analysis revealed that the LED of dopaminergic drugs taken before bedtime (p < 0.00), LED of dopaminergic drugs taken over a 24-h period (p < 0.00), and scores of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) (p = 0.01) were determinants of PDSS. CONCLUSION: Sleep disorders in PD patients may be multifactorial. High dosage of dopaminergic drugs taken prior to sleep, daily total high dosage of dopaminergic drugs, and depression exert negative effects on subjective sleep. The timing and dosage of dopaminergic drugs taken before bedtime should be considered in PD management.


Assuntos
Doença de Parkinson , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília , Humanos , Doença de Parkinson/complicações , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Parkinson/epidemiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/epidemiologia , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/etiologia , Dopaminérgicos/efeitos adversos , Sono , Levodopa
3.
N Engl J Med ; 387(22): 2045-2055, 2022 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36449420

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Iron content is increased in the substantia nigra of persons with Parkinson's disease and may contribute to the pathophysiology of the disorder. Early research suggests that the iron chelator deferiprone can reduce nigrostriatal iron content in persons with Parkinson's disease, but its effects on disease progression are unclear. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, phase 2, randomized, double-blind trial involving participants with newly diagnosed Parkinson's disease who had never received levodopa. Participants were assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to receive oral deferiprone at a dose of 15 mg per kilogram of body weight twice daily or matched placebo for 36 weeks. Dopaminergic therapy was withheld unless deemed necessary for symptom control. The primary outcome was the change in the total score on the Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS; range, 0 to 260, with higher scores indicating more severe impairment) at 36 weeks. Secondary and exploratory clinical outcomes at up to 40 weeks included measures of motor and nonmotor disability. Brain iron content measured with the use of magnetic resonance imaging was also an exploratory outcome. RESULTS: A total of 372 participants were enrolled; 186 were assigned to receive deferiprone and 186 to receive placebo. Progression of symptoms led to the initiation of dopaminergic therapy in 22.0% of the participants in the deferiprone group and 2.7% of those in the placebo group. The mean MDS-UPDRS total score at baseline was 34.3 in the deferiprone group and 33.2 in the placebo group and increased (worsened) by 15.6 points and 6.3 points, respectively (difference, 9.3 points; 95% confidence interval, 6.3 to 12.2; P<0.001). Nigrostriatal iron content decreased more in the deferiprone group than in the placebo group. The main serious adverse events with deferiprone were agranulocytosis in 2 participants and neutropenia in 3 participants. CONCLUSIONS: In participants with early Parkinson's disease who had never received levodopa and in whom treatment with dopaminergic medications was not planned, deferiprone was associated with worse scores in measures of parkinsonism than those with placebo over a period of 36 weeks. (Funded by the European Union Horizon 2020 program; FAIRPARK-II ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02655315.).


Assuntos
Antiparkinsonianos , Deferiprona , Quelantes de Ferro , Ferro , Doença de Parkinson , Substância Negra , Humanos , Deferiprona/administração & dosagem , Deferiprona/efeitos adversos , Deferiprona/farmacologia , Deferiprona/uso terapêutico , Ferro/análise , Ferro/metabolismo , Levodopa/uso terapêutico , Neutropenia/induzido quimicamente , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Parkinson/metabolismo , Doença de Parkinson/fisiopatologia , Quelantes de Ferro/administração & dosagem , Quelantes de Ferro/efeitos adversos , Quelantes de Ferro/farmacologia , Quelantes de Ferro/uso terapêutico , Substância Negra/química , Substância Negra/diagnóstico por imagem , Substância Negra/efeitos dos fármacos , Substância Negra/metabolismo , Progressão da Doença , Método Duplo-Cego , Administração Oral , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Química Encefálica , Dopaminérgicos/administração & dosagem , Dopaminérgicos/efeitos adversos , Dopaminérgicos/farmacologia , Dopaminérgicos/uso terapêutico , Antiparkinsonianos/administração & dosagem , Antiparkinsonianos/efeitos adversos , Antiparkinsonianos/farmacologia , Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapêutico
4.
Prog Brain Res ; 269(1): 309-343, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35248200

RESUMO

Parkinson's disease (PD) is commonly treated with dopaminergic medication, which enhances some, while impairing other cognitive functions. It can even contribute to impulse control disorder and addiction. We describe the history of research supporting the dopamine overdose hypothesis, which accounts for the large within-patient variability in dopaminergic medication effects across different tasks by referring to the spatially non-uniform pattern of dopamine depletion in dorsal versus ventral striatum. However, there is tremendous variability in dopaminergic medication effects not just within patients across distinct tasks, but also across different patients. In the second part of this chapter we review recent studies addressing the large individual variability in the negative side effects of dopaminergic medication on functions that implicate dopamine, such as value-based learning and choice. These studies begin to unravel the mechanisms of dopamine overdosing, thus revising the strict version of the overdose hypothesis. For example, the work shows that the canonical boosting of reward-versus punishment-based choice by medication is greater in patients with depression and a non-tremor phenotype, which both implicate, among other pathology, more rather than less severe dysregulation of the mesolimbic dopamine system. Future longitudinal cohort studies are needed to identify how to optimally combine different clinical, personality, cognitive, neural, genetic and molecular predictors of detrimental medication effects in order to account for as much of the relevant variability as possible. This will provide a useful tool for precision neurology, allowing individual and contextual tailoring of (the dose of) dopaminergic medication in order to maximize its cognitive benefits, yet minimize its side effects.


Assuntos
Disfunção Cognitiva , Doença de Parkinson , Disfunção Cognitiva/tratamento farmacológico , Disfunção Cognitiva/etiologia , Dopamina , Dopaminérgicos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Doença de Parkinson/complicações , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Recompensa
5.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol ; 58: 30-38, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35189453

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Dopamine receptor agonist drugs, which are used, for example, to treat Parkinson's disease (PD), increase the risk for impulse control disorders (ICDs), potentially resulting in devastating psychosocial consequences. It is unknown whether other drugs with dopaminergic properties also increase the risk for ICDs. This study assesses the disproportionality of reporting ICDs between drugs with dopaminergic properties and selected non-dopaminergic drugs. METHODS: A case/non-case disproportionality analysis was performed, using data from VigiBase (1968-2020). Reports on ICDs as suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were cases (n=852), and those with ADRs other than ICDs were non-cases (n=281,720). Relative reporting frequencies were expressed as adjusted reporting odds ratios (aRORs). Within the dopamine receptor agonists, the relationship between reporting odds ratios and dopamine receptor occupancy was explored. RESULTS: A high disproportionality was found for reporting ICDs for all dopaminergic drugs (aROR 20.4 [95% CI 17.4-24.1]) compared to non-dopaminergic drugs. In pharmacotherapeutic subgroups, a high disproportionality was found for primary dopaminergic agents used in PD (aROR 52.1 [95% CI 44.1-61.5]), and to a lesser extent for ADHD psychostimulants and antidepressants (aROR 5.8 [95% 4.1-8.3] and aROR 3.9 [95% CI 2.9-5.6], respectively). There was no difference in reporting by consumers and healthcare professionals. The highest disproportionality was found for the dopamine receptor agonists pramipexole and ropinirole. CONCLUSIONS: A signal of disproportion in ICD occurrence was found among all investigated drugs with dopaminergic properties, highlighting the importance of counselling and monitoring for ICDs when prescribing dopaminergic drugs.


Assuntos
Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Doença de Parkinson , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/induzido quimicamente , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/epidemiologia , Dopaminérgicos/efeitos adversos , Agonistas de Dopamina/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Parkinson/epidemiologia , Pramipexol/efeitos adversos
6.
Eur J Endocrinol ; 186(3): P1-P33, 2022 Feb 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35000899

RESUMO

Prolactinomas are the most frequent pituitary adenomas. Prolactinoma may occur in different clinical settings and always require an individually tailored approach. This is the reason why a panel of Italian neuroendocrine experts was charged with the task to provide indications for the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches that can be easily applied in different contexts. The document provides 15 recommendations for diagnosis and 54 recommendations for treatment, issued according to the GRADE system. The level of agreement among panel members was formally evaluated by RAND-UCLA methodology. In the last century, prolactinomas represented the paradigm of pituitary tumors for which the development of highly effective drugs obtained the best results, allowing to avoid neurosurgery in most cases. The impressive improvement of neurosurgical endoscopic techniques allows a far better definition of the tumoral tissue during surgery and the remission of endocrine symptoms in many patients with pituitary tumors. Consequently, this refinement of neurosurgery is changing the therapeutic strategy in prolactinomas, allowing the definitive cure of some patients with permanent discontinuation of medical therapy.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Hipofisárias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/terapia , Prolactinoma/diagnóstico , Prolactinoma/terapia , Criança , Consenso , Dopaminérgicos/efeitos adversos , Dopaminérgicos/uso terapêutico , Endocrinologia , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Humanos , Hiperprolactinemia/etiologia , Hiperprolactinemia/terapia , Itália , Masculino , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/métodos , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/etiologia , Gravidez , Prolactinoma/etiologia , Radioterapia
7.
Eur J Neurol ; 29(4): 1227-1231, 2022 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34923723

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Augmentation is a paradoxical reaction mainly to dopaminergic medication in patients with restless legs syndrome (RLS), but the exact pathomechanism remains unclear. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with augmentation in RLS patients. METHODS: RLS patients with and without current or previous augmentation were recruited. Demographic characteristics, history of smoking, questionnaires for depression, alexithymia, and impulsivity, and RLS severity were obtained. RESULTS: We included 122 patients, of whom half had a history of augmentation. Patients with augmentation had a longer disease duration (p = 0.001), had higher RLS severity scores (p = 0.013), had higher levodopa equivalent doses (p < 0.001), had higher scores for alexithymia (p = 0.028), had higher prevalence of impulse control disorders (p < 0.001), more often had a history of smoking (p = 0.039), were more often currently smoking (p = 0.015), and had more average pack-years (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Here, we describe several factors commonly associated with augmentation in RLS. These may help clinicians to screen and treat patients carefully to avoid the challenging side effect of augmentation.


Assuntos
Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta , Síndrome das Pernas Inquietas , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/complicações , Dopaminérgicos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Levodopa/efeitos adversos , Síndrome das Pernas Inquietas/tratamento farmacológico , Inquéritos e Questionários
8.
Neurology ; 97(20): 942-957, 2021 11 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34782410

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To review the current evidence on the options available for initiating dopaminergic treatment of motor symptoms in early-stage Parkinson disease and provide recommendations to clinicians. METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel developed practice recommendations, integrating findings from a systematic review and following an Institute of Medicine-compliant process to ensure transparency and patient engagement. Recommendations were supported by structured rationales, integrating evidence from the systematic review, related evidence, principles of care, and inferences from evidence. RESULTS: Initial treatment with levodopa provides superior motor benefit compared to treatment with dopamine agonists, whereas levodopa is more likely than dopamine agonists to cause dyskinesia. The comparison of different formulations of dopamine agonists yielded little evidence that any one formulation or method of administration is superior. Long-acting forms of levodopa and levodopa with entacapone do not appear to differ in efficacy from immediate-release levodopa for motor symptoms in early disease. There is a higher risk of impulse control disorders associated with the use of dopamine agonists than levodopa. Recommendations on initial therapy for motor symptoms are provided to assist the clinician and patient in choosing between treatment options and to guide counseling, prescribing, and monitoring of efficacy and safety.


Assuntos
Dopaminérgicos , Atividade Motora , Doença de Parkinson , Dopaminérgicos/efeitos adversos , Dopaminérgicos/uso terapêutico , Agonistas de Dopamina/efeitos adversos , Agonistas de Dopamina/uso terapêutico , Discinesia Induzida por Medicamentos , Humanos , Levodopa/efeitos adversos , Levodopa/uso terapêutico , Atividade Motora/fisiologia , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Parkinson/fisiopatologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto
9.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord ; 84: 52-60, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33561612

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Levodopa-induced dyskinesia frequently complicates long-term Parkinson's disease. More in-depth knowledge regarding the role of genetic factors in dyskinesia development may be important to identify parkinsonian patients who are more prone to developing dyskinesia and clarify the molecular mechanisms underlying this condition. For this reason, we systematically reviewed studies investigating genetic factors involved in dyskinesia. METHODS: A systematic search of genetic factors in Parkinson's disease dyskinesia was performed using the MEDLINE (through PubMed up to June 2019) and EMBASE databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A meta-analysis was conducted using a random effect model. RESULTS: The literature search retrieved 33 studies assessing genes and variants possibly associated with dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease. The studies were published between 1984 and 2019 and included a total of 27,092 subjects of different ethnicities. Overall, 37 genes were analyzed in the studies reviewed, of which 22 were possibly associated with dyskinesia. The studies reported a total of 158 variants, of which 94 were possibly related to dyskinesia. CONCLUSION: The studies reviewed demonstrated inconsistent results, possibly due to differences in screening methods and in the comparison of clinical data in a large variety of genetically- and ethnically-diverse populations. The meta-analysis failed to demonstrate any association between the rs6280 in the DRD3 gene, rs1799836 in the MAO-B, rs4680 in the COMT gene, rs34637584 in the LRRK2 gene and LID susceptibility. The role of genetic factors in LID susceptibility is still unclear and further studies are required.


Assuntos
Dopaminérgicos/efeitos adversos , Discinesia Induzida por Medicamentos/genética , Levodopa/efeitos adversos , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Parkinson/genética , Humanos
11.
Exp Neurol ; 336: 113534, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33249031

RESUMO

Parkinson's Disease (PD) is symptomatically managed with L-DOPA but chronic use results in L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia (LID) characterized by abnormal involuntary movements (AIMs). In LID, dopamine D3 receptors (D3R) are upregulated on D1 receptor (D1R)-bearing medium spiny neurons where the can synergistically drive downstream signaling and motor behaviors. Despite evidence implying D1R-D3R cooperativity in LID, the dyskinesiogenic role of D3R has never been directly tested. To this end, we developed a specific cre-dependent microRNA (miRNA) to irreversibly prevent D3R upregulation in D1R striatal cells. D1-Cre rats received unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine lesions. Three weeks later, rats received an adeno-associated virus expressing either D3R miRNA or a scrambled (SCR) miRNA delivered into the striatum. After 4 weeks, rats received chronic L-DOPA (6 mg/kg) or vehicle. AIMs development and motor behaviors were assayed throughout treatment. At the conclusion of the experiment, efficacy and fidelity of the miRNA strategy was analyzed using in situ hybridization (ISH). ISH analyses demonstrated that D1R+/D3R+ cells were upregulated in LID and that the selective D3R miRNA reduced D1R+/D3R+ co-expression. Importantly, silencing of D3R also significantly attenuated LID development without impacting L-DOPA efficacy or other locomotion. These data highlight a dyskinesiogenic role of D3R within D1R cells in LID and highlight aberrant D1R-D3R interactions as targets of LID management.


Assuntos
Dopaminérgicos/efeitos adversos , Discinesia Induzida por Medicamentos/genética , Discinesia Induzida por Medicamentos/prevenção & controle , Levodopa/efeitos adversos , Neostriado/patologia , Receptores de Dopamina D1/genética , Receptores de Dopamina D3/genética , Animais , Comportamento Animal , Discinesia Induzida por Medicamentos/psicologia , Feminino , Terapia Genética , Hidroxidopaminas , Masculino , MicroRNAs/genética , Neostriado/metabolismo , Desempenho Psicomotor , Ratos
13.
Neurobiol Dis ; 144: 105044, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32798726

RESUMO

Acetylcholine muscarinic receptors (mAChRs) contribute to both the facilitation and inhibition of levodopa-induced dyskinesia operated by striatal cholinergic interneurons, although the receptor subtypes involved remain elusive. Cholinergic afferents from the midbrain also innervate the substantia nigra reticulata, although the role of nigral mAChRs in levodopa-induced dyskinesia is unknown. Here, we investigate whether striatal and nigral M1 and/or M4 mAChRs modulate dyskinesia and the underlying striato-nigral GABAergic pathway activation in 6-hydroxydopamine hemilesioned rats. Reverse microdialysis allowed to deliver the mAChR antagonists telenzepine (M1 subtype preferring), PD-102807 and tropicamide (M4 subtype preferring), as well as the selective M4 mAChR positive allosteric modulator VU0152100 in striatum or substantia nigra, while levodopa was administered systemically. Dyskinetic movements were monitored along with nigral GABA (and glutamate) and striatal glutamate dialysate levels, taken as neurochemical correlates of striato-nigral pathway and cortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical loop activation. We observed that intrastriatal telenzepine, PD-102807 and tropicamide alleviated dyskinesia and inhibited nigral GABA and striatal glutamate release. This was partially replicated by intrastriatal VU0152100. The M2 subtype preferring antagonist AFDX-116, used to elevate striatal acetylcholine levels, blocked the behavioral and neurochemical effects of PD-102807. Intranigral VU0152100 prevented levodopa-induced dyskinesia and its neurochemical correlates whereas PD-102807 was ineffective. These results suggest that striatal, likely postsynaptic, M1 mAChRs facilitate dyskinesia and striato-nigral pathway activation in vivo. Conversely, striatal M4 mAChRs can both facilitate and inhibit dyskinesia, possibly depending on their localization. Potentiation of striatal and nigral M4 mAChR transmission leads to powerful multilevel inhibition of striato-nigral pathway and attenuation of dyskinesia.


Assuntos
Dopaminérgicos/efeitos adversos , Discinesia Induzida por Medicamentos/metabolismo , Levodopa/efeitos adversos , Neostriado/metabolismo , Receptor Muscarínico M1/metabolismo , Receptor Muscarínico M4/metabolismo , Substância Negra/metabolismo , Regulação Alostérica , Animais , Discinesia Induzida por Medicamentos/etiologia , Discinesia Induzida por Medicamentos/fisiopatologia , Ácido Glutâmico/efeitos dos fármacos , Ácido Glutâmico/metabolismo , Microdiálise , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/farmacologia , Neostriado/efeitos dos fármacos , Vias Neurais , Oxidopamina/toxicidade , Transtornos Parkinsonianos/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Parkinsonianos/etiologia , Transtornos Parkinsonianos/metabolismo , Ratos , Receptor Muscarínico M1/antagonistas & inibidores , Receptor Muscarínico M4/antagonistas & inibidores , Substância Negra/efeitos dos fármacos , Simpatolíticos/toxicidade , Ácido gama-Aminobutírico/efeitos dos fármacos , Ácido gama-Aminobutírico/metabolismo
14.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord ; 78: 151-157, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32846366

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Long-term treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) with l-DOPA typically leads to development of l-DOPA induced dyskinesia (LID). Amantadine, an NMDA antagonist, attenuates LID, but with limited efficacy and considerable side-effects. NLX-112 (also known as befiradol or F13640), a highly selective and efficacious 5-HT1A receptor agonist, reduced LID when tested in rodent and marmoset models of PD. METHODS: The effects of NLX-112 (0.03, 0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg PO) on established LID evoked by acute challenge with l-DOPA (27.5 ± 3.8 mg/kg PO) were assessed in MPTP-treated cynomolgus macaques. Amantadine (10 mg/kg PO) was tested as a positive control. Plasma exposure of NLX-112 (0.1 mg/kg PO) was determined. RESULTS: NLX-112 significantly and dose-dependently reduced median LID levels by up to 96% during the first hour post-administration (0.3 mg/kg). Moreover, NLX-112 reduced the duration of 'bad on-time' associated with disabling LID by up to 48% (0.3 mg/kg). In contrast, NLX-112 had negligible impact on the anti-parkinsonian benefit of l-DOPA. NLX-112 exposure peaked at ~50 ng/ml at 30 min post-administration but decreased to ~15 ng/ml at 2h. Amantadine reduced by 42% 'bad on-time' associated with l-DOPA, thereby validating the model. CONCLUSION: These data show that, in MPTP-lesioned cynomolgus macaques, NLX-112 exerts robust anti-dyskinetic effects, without reducing the anti-parkinsonian benefit of l-DOPA. These observations complement previous findings and suggest that selective and high efficacy activation of 5-HT1A receptors by NLX-112 may constitute a promising approach to combat LID in PD, providing an alternative for patients in whom amantadine is poorly tolerated or without useful effect.


Assuntos
Amantadina/farmacologia , Dopaminérgicos/farmacologia , Discinesia Induzida por Medicamentos/tratamento farmacológico , Levodopa/farmacologia , Transtornos Parkinsonianos/tratamento farmacológico , Piperidinas/farmacologia , Piridinas/farmacologia , Agonistas do Receptor 5-HT1 de Serotonina/farmacologia , Amantadina/administração & dosagem , Animais , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Dopaminérgicos/efeitos adversos , Discinesia Induzida por Medicamentos/etiologia , Feminino , Levodopa/efeitos adversos , Macaca fascicularis , Piperidinas/administração & dosagem , Piperidinas/farmacocinética , Piridinas/administração & dosagem , Piridinas/farmacocinética , Agonistas do Receptor 5-HT1 de Serotonina/administração & dosagem , Agonistas do Receptor 5-HT1 de Serotonina/farmacocinética
15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32775020

RESUMO

Background: Multiple system atrophy (MSA) may develop levodopa-induced dyskinesia, which is dystonic and predominant in the orofacial region. We aimed to characterize the patterns of presynaptic dopaminergic degeneration in patients with MSA and dyskinesia using 123I-N-x-fluoropropyl-2b-carbo-methoxy-3b-(4-iodophenyl) nortropan single-photon emission computed tomography (123I-FP-CIT SPECT). Methods: A single center cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted using consecutive chart review of patients with probable MSA who underwent 123I-FP-CIT SPECT. The degeneration patterns were compared between the groups with and without dyskinesia via visual assessment of 123I-FP-CIT SPECT images. Results: Twenty-five patients with probable MSA who had undergone dopamine transporter imaging were identified (age [mean ± standard error], 62.5 ± 1.7 years; disease duration, 48.8 ± 7.0 months). Four of them presented dyskinesia and 21 of patients did not. Twenty-five patients with MSA were visually classified into five grades: one Grade 1 (normal), two Grade 2 (eagle wing), three Grade 3 (mixed), nine Grade 4 (egg shape), and ten Grade 5 (burst striatum). All patients with MSA and dyskinesia were classified into Grade 5. Visual grading significantly correlated with disease duration and levodopa responsiveness. Conclusions: Severe presynaptic dopaminergic dysfunction in 123I-FP-CIT SPECT images, higher doses of dopaminergic medication, and longer disease durations were associated with occurrence of levodopa-induced dyskinesia, even in MSA.


Assuntos
Dopaminérgicos/efeitos adversos , Proteínas da Membrana Plasmática de Transporte de Dopamina/metabolismo , Neurônios Dopaminérgicos/metabolismo , Discinesia Induzida por Medicamentos/diagnóstico por imagem , Levodopa/efeitos adversos , Atrofia de Múltiplos Sistemas/tratamento farmacológico , Neostriado/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Discinesia Induzida por Medicamentos/metabolismo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Atrofia de Múltiplos Sistemas/diagnóstico por imagem , Atrofia de Múltiplos Sistemas/metabolismo , Neostriado/metabolismo , Doenças Neurodegenerativas/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Neurodegenerativas/metabolismo , Terminações Pré-Sinápticas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada de Emissão de Fóton Único , Tropanos
16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32775034

RESUMO

Background: The impact of slight-to-moderate levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) on the level of participation in active life in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) has never been objectively determined. Methods: Levels of LID, tremor and bradykinesia were measured during best-ON state in 121 patients diagnosed with PD and having peak-dose LID using inertial sensors positioned on each body limb. Rigidity and postural instability were assessed using clinical evaluations. Cognition and depression were assessed using the MMSE and the GDS-15. Participation in active life was assessed in patients and in 69 healthy controls using the Activity Card Sort (ACS), which measures levels of activity engagement and activities affected by the symptomatology. Outcome measures were compared between patients and controls using ANCOVA, controlling for age or Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests. Spearman correlations and multivariate analyses were then performed between symptomatology and ACS scores. Results: Patients had significantly lower activity engagement than controls and had significantly affected activities. LID was neither associated with activity engagement nor affected activities. Higher levels of tremor, postural instability, cognitive decline and depression were associated with lower activity engagement and higher affected activities. Multivariate analyses revealed that only tremor, postural instability and depression accounted significantly in the variances of these variables. Discussion: Slight-to-moderate LID had little impact compared to other symptoms on the level of participation in active life, suggesting that other symptoms should remain the treatment priority to maintain the level of participation of patients in an active lifestyle.


Assuntos
Atividades Cotidianas , Discinesia Induzida por Medicamentos , Doença de Parkinson , Participação Social , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Dopaminérgicos/efeitos adversos , Discinesia Induzida por Medicamentos/etiologia , Discinesia Induzida por Medicamentos/fisiopatologia , Discinesia Induzida por Medicamentos/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Levodopa/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Parkinson/fisiopatologia , Doença de Parkinson/psicologia
18.
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol ; 23(8): 496-504, 2020 11 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32710539

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The most common psychiatric complications due to dopaminergic treatment in Parkinson's disease are visual hallucinations and impulse control disorders. Their development depends on clinical and genetic factors. METHODS: We evaluated the simultaneous effect of 16 clinical and 34 genetic variables on the occurrence of visual hallucinations and impulse control disorders. Altogether, 214 Parkinson's disease patients were enrolled. Their demographic, clinical, and genotype data were obtained. Clinical and clinical-pharmacogenetic models were built by The Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator penalized logistic regression. The predictive capacity was evaluated with the cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: The clinical-pharmacogenetic index for prediction of visual hallucinations encompassed age at diagnosis (OR = 0.99), rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (OR = 2.27), depression (OR = 1.0002), IL6 rs1800795 (OR = 0.99), GPX1 s1050450 (OR = 1.07), COMT rs165815 (OR = 0.69), MAOB rs1799836 (OR = 0.97), DRD3 rs6280 (OR = 1.32), and BIRC5 rs8073069 (OR = 0.94). The clinical-pharmacogenetic index for prediction of impulse control disorders encompassed age at diagnosis (OR = 0.95), depression (OR = 1.75), beta-blockers (OR = 0.99), coffee consumption (OR = 0.97), NOS1 rs2682826 (OR = 1.15), SLC6A3 rs393795 (OR = 1.27), SLC22A1 rs628031 (OR = 1.19), DRD2 rs1799732 (OR = 0.88), DRD3 rs6280 (OR = 0.88), and NRG1 rs3924999 (OR = 0.96). The cross-validated AUCs of clinical and clinical-pharmacogenetic models for visual hallucinations were 0.60 and 0.59, respectively. The AUCs of clinical and clinical-pharmacogenetic models for impulse control disorders were 0.72 and 0.71, respectively. The AUCs show that the addition of selected genetic variables to the analysis does not contribute to better prediction of visual hallucinations and impulse control disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Models could be improved by a larger cohort and by addition of other types of Parkinson's disease biomarkers to the analysis.


Assuntos
Antiparkinsonianos/efeitos adversos , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/induzido quimicamente , Dopaminérgicos/efeitos adversos , Alucinações/induzido quimicamente , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Variantes Farmacogenômicos , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/diagnóstico , Transtornos Disruptivos, de Controle do Impulso e da Conduta/genética , Feminino , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Alucinações/diagnóstico , Alucinações/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Farmacogenética , Testes Farmacogenômicos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco
19.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord ; 75: 80-84, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32497995

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: In patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), pulsatile dopaminergic stimulation may be a primary cause of levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID). We aimed to investigate the correlation between levodopa pharmacokinetics (PK) and LID in PD. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the consecutive series of 255 PD patients without LID who underwent PK assessments with 100 mg levodopa. The type of peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor used in the PK assessments was determined by the usual prescription of the formulations of levodopa (10 mg carbidopa [n = 185] and 25 mg benserazide [n = 70]). RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 32 months (IQR, 16-49 months), 73 patients (29%) developed LID. Compared with patients who did not develop LID (PD-LID-), those who developed LID (PD-LID+) were younger (p = 0.003) and had significantly higher maximum levodopa concentration (Cmax) (p = 0.002) and area under the curve (p < 0.001), LEDD (p < 0.001), and improvement of motor symptoms (p = 0.009). In the multivariate Cox proportional hazards models, Cmax and AUC were associated with incident LID (Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.19 and HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.24, respectively). In addition, younger age, benserazide use, LEDD, and MAOBI use were associated with incident LID. CONCLUSION: High levodopa plasma concentration after oral administration was associated with incident LID in patients with PD.


Assuntos
Dopaminérgicos/sangue , Discinesia Induzida por Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Levodopa/sangue , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Dopaminérgicos/administração & dosagem , Dopaminérgicos/efeitos adversos , Discinesia Induzida por Medicamentos/etiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Levodopa/administração & dosagem , Levodopa/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos
20.
Ann Clin Transl Neurol ; 7(5): 677-682, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32352220

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The brittle response (BR) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) refers to a special type of levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID). This study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics of BR patients and to analyze the associated risk factors. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the data of 97 patients with PD. Patients were divided into a BR group and a non-brittle response (NBR) group. Demographic and clinical data, motor symptoms, and non-motor symptoms of the two groups were assessed. RESULTS: Among 97 PD patients, 11 were in the BR group and 86 were in the NBR group. The proportion of female patients was 72.7% and 38.3%, respectively, in the BR and NBR groups (P < 0.05). Compared to NBR patients, BR patients had relatively low body weight, low BMI, long disease duration, high levodopa equivalent daily dosage (LEDD), and high levodopa dose per weight (P < 0.05). The BR group had significantly higher scores of UPDRS (II, III, and IV) (P < 0.05). But no difference was found in the UPDRS I, emotional state, cognitive status, and accompanied by REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) (P> 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that BR patients had lower body weight and higher levodopa dose per weight. CONCLUSION: BR is associated with being female, low body weight, low BMI, long disease duration, high LEDD, and high levodopa dose per weight. Body weight and levodopa dose per body weight are independent risk factors for BR.


Assuntos
Dopaminérgicos/efeitos adversos , Discinesia Induzida por Medicamentos/etiologia , Discinesia Induzida por Medicamentos/fisiopatologia , Levodopa/efeitos adversos , Doença de Parkinson/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Índice de Massa Corporal , Peso Corporal/fisiologia , Dopaminérgicos/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Levodopa/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...